RTBU Express
RTBU Express
Visit Bus Express Visit the Bus Express
Visit RTBU Express Visit the RTBU Express
Visit RTBU National Visit the RTBU National

Negotiations for Replacement of the Pacific  National Bulk Rail NSW Enterprise Agreement  2018

Members would have seen Pacific National’s recent separate communications to both Coal and Bulk  employees on negotiations. While we can report that there were some basic commonalities expressed  between the parties on wanting simplicity and one agreement, the reality was and is that so far, the  discussions have proven frustrating. 

Negotiating an enterprise agreement hinges on getting the scope and structure of the agreement sorted  prior to talking about matters that will be included within the EA. As members would know, while PN tell  us they want one EA, the factual and lawful reality is that they issued two separate “NERR” Notices for  two separate enterprise agreements. They also stated from the outset they are considering four different  options. (Reported in our last newsletter)  

At the last meeting, Pacific National wanted the RTBU to provide its log of claims to them on the basis that  they need to know our claims so as they can decide if a merged Part B and C is feasible for them. The  RTBU was reluctant to provide the log of claims, not knowing into what agreement or agreements those  claims would be included. Without knowing what we are actually bargaining for, we were concerned that  to present our log of claims would possibly disadvantage members. 

The RTBU pushed Pacific National on this concern and asked Pacific National as to why, if its preference is for one EA, did they issue two separate NERR’s for two separate agreements? We also asked if their  first preference is for one EA (their EA with a new “Part E” section for new employees tacked on to it),  what is their second preference from their four bucket options? Other than stating Scope can be sorted at  any time during negotiations, no answer was given. The RTBU rejected this contention, as the current  scope and structure proposals made by Pacific National make it impossible to fairly present claims that  apply to all four of Pacific National’s proposals.  

The RTBU again advised PN we are negotiating for one EA that covers all the classifications listed in the  current agreement and that we want the parent company and its subsidiaries covered so as to protect your  future employment. This is achieved by restricting PN from using its other companies to start competing  businesses and transfer employees out of Enterprise Agreement covered corporations into the new  businesses to erode your conditions, as they have done to the IPS employees. 

Our scope claim is “Pacific National, including Australian Logistics Acquisition Holdings Pty Limited  (ACN 611 628 909) and each of its subsidiaries, and its employees engaged in the existing  classifications in the Agreement in NSW.” 

The RTBU did provide the company with some high-level principles underlying its claims; Simplicity, Work Life Balance, Clarity and Job Security.  

Pacific National responded to two of our claims stating it would not accept compulsorily arbitration in the  enterprise agreement, nor will it even discuss including IPS employees in the agreement. The RTBU 

Locomotive division made very clear to PN that we will not accept their ’Part E’ proposal for new employees  that will leave them with lesser conditions and undermine current employees who have fought for decades  to achieve a balance. 

While we would like to believe Pacific National is genuine in relation to looking at a merge of the train crew  sections of the agreement and wanting to progress the negotiations in a reasonable manner, so far this  has not been demonstrated. Members more than anyone understand the challenges the pandemic has  put on all society, however PN agreed in the last EA to start negotiations 12 months out if we agreed to  forgo the sunset clause. In good faith everyone agreed to do this, yet when the time came this didn’t  happen. We wrote to Pacific National to start talks but they didn’t want to start until we could meet face to  face. We wrote and asked if the company intended changing the scope of the agreement, PN responded  they wanted to talk to the CEO and would come back to us. They didn’t, and then issued two separate  NERR’s. In addition to all this, PN has; 

  1. Restricted the number of delegates to attend the negotiations
  2. Initially refused to pay for the delegates accommodation
  3. Insisted the meetings are held at various country locations in an effort to provide them some “listening to employees” (This can only be considered as a PR spin, as no arrangements have been made for employees to actually attend or be listened to)

While we will continue to bargain in good faith and work towards agreement on a path forward, if we do  not see movement towards a more sensible and fair approach, we will need to consider options available  to us through the Fair Work Commission. 

If PN are serious about their PNA then, it should be SAME JOB SAME PAY  

  • Same pay for Labour Hire – Employ them directly
  • Same pay for IPS

Download the Newsflash here